Trainees Edition Trainers Edition Trainees Edition Trainers Edition


Module 11: Journalism, New Journalism Practices and Their Social Effects

Module Description

The main purpose of this Module is to describe the main characteristics of journalism, explain the impact of journalistic values and define the effects of new journalism practices on society.

The secondary aim is to guide trainers who want to use the content of this Module to train their trainees.

With these aims, information about journalism and its effects are presented along with guidelines about how to teach the subject.

Trainees who successfully complete this Module will be able to:

  • define journalism with its aims and characteristics
  • define news and its values
  • understand the effects of journalism on democracy
  • understand new journalism practices
  • understand the new newsmaking habitat and its effects on people.

In addition, trainers who successfully complete this Module will have an understanding of the definition and functions of journalism, as well as the new practices that have emerged with the changing media environment.

Module Structure

This Module consists of the following parts:

  • Objective, Description of the Content and Learning Outcomes
  • Structure of the Module
  • Guidelines for Trainees
  • Guidelines for Trainers (how to get prepared, methods to use and tips for trainers)
  • Content (study materials and exercises)
  • Quiz
  • Resources (references and recommended sources and videos)

Main objectives of the Module, description of the content and the learning outcomes are explained in the Module Description part. Guidelines for Trainees includes instructions and suggestions for trainees. Guidelines for Trainers leads trainers through different phases of the training and provides tips which could be useful while teaching the subject. Content includes all study materials and the content related exercises. Quiz includes true/false questions for trainees to test their progress. Resources have two components: references and recommended sources for further reading and study. References is the list of sources cited in the content part. Recommended resources consist of a list of supplemental sources and videos which are highly recommended to read and watch for learning more on the topic.

Guidelines for Trainees

Trainees are expected to read the text, watch the recommended video and do the exercises. They can consult suggested resources for further information. After completing the study of the content trainees are strongly suggested to take the quiz to evaluate their progress. They can revise the study material if needed.

Guidelines for Trainers

Guidelines for trainers includes suggestions and tips for trainers about how to use the content of this Module to train people on the concept of journalism, new journalism practices and its effects on people.

Getting Prepared

Preparing a presentation (PowerPoint/Prezi/Canva) which is enriched with visual materials (images and video clips) and research based factual information is strongly suggested. Moreover, it is suggested to choose country-specific reading lists for trainees to better understand the concepts.

Getting Started

A short quiz (3 to 5 questions) in Kahoot or questions with Mentimeter can be used at the beginning for engaging participants in the topic. It can be used as a motivation tool as well as a tool to check trainees’ existing knowledge about the subject. Some examples for questions could be: What is the role of a journalist in a society? Which ones of the following can be listed as news values?

Methods to Use

Various teaching methods can be used in combination during the training. Such as:

  • Lecturing
  • Discussion
  • Group work
  • Self reflection

Tips for Trainers


An effective way of involving participants and setting common expectations about what they will learn is to ask a few preliminary questions on the subject. This can be done through group work by asking trainees to discuss and collect ideas, but also individually by asking each participant to write their ideas on sticky notes.

The activity can be conducted as follows:

  • Ask trainees whether they know the link between journalism and democracy.
  • Invite trainees to elaborate on the connection of these two notions.
  • Ask trainees about their experiences about the new news environments.
  • Ask trainees if they trust journalists and guide them to discuss their justifications.

Presenting the Objective of the Lesson

The objective of the lesson should be made clear (which is to describe the main characteristics of journalism, explain the impact of journalistic values and define the effects of new journalism practices on society). Following the warm-up questions it will be easier to clarify the objectives.

Presenting the Lesson Content

While presenting the content make sure to interact with the trainees and encourage them for active participation.

  • Before providing a definition of journalism and news, ask participants to come up with their own.
  • When introducing information about the changing news environment, ask participants to elaborate on it first.
  • Before providing information about new journalism practices, ask the participants about their awareness of this issue and from which news platforms they feed.
  • When introducing information about the effects of changing news and media habitat, ask participants if they are aware of these effects of this new environment and guide them to discuss these issues.


Make a short summary of the lesson and ask a couple of questions which help underlie the most important messages you would like to give. Following questions can help:

  • Ask trainees about the threats of “bad” journalism on societies.
  • Ask trainees if they are willing to learn more about evaluating news or any kind of information. This may help to prepare them for the following modules on fact-checking.

Content: Journalism, New Journalism Practices and Their Social Effects

Introduction: What is Journalism?

Journalism can be defined as “the practice of gathering, recording, verifying, and reporting on information of public importance”. The idea of “objectivity” is the basic distinctive property of journalistic practices when compared to other non-fiction writing. Journalists are expected;

  • To keep an objective mindset during interviews, their research for the news, reporting their stories,
  • Not to persuade their readers but instead to inform.
  • To track the primary sources in order to gain insight (such as, interviewing people primarily affected by an incident, written evidence, archive documents, etc).

Opinions can also be included in the journalism practices, but journalists must be conscious and careful of keeping subjectivity limited to pieces such as, editorials, columns or other opinion-based content (Purdue University, n.d.).

Especially in the digital age, the ways of consuming all types of information including news have changed dramatically. This also affected journalism practices in terms of collecting information to produce news and disseminating it, while their basic duties have been consistent. Today’s journalists not only write traditional news texts but perform different roles such as, producing podcasts or YouTube videos, film documentaries, help run 24-hour broadcasts (via TV or other social media channels), to help us keep up with the news especially via the Internet. These efforts help the public learn what is happening in the world so they may make informed decisions (Purdue University, n.d.).

The Journalist’s Role and Journalistic Ethics

“The central purpose of journalism is to provide citizens with accurate and reliable information they need to function in a free society.” (Potter, 2006, p. 3)

Informed citizens are the backbone of democracies. People need information in order to govern themselves. Journalists and the news media is a primary source for that. To assure that journalists are able to do their job as desired, many countries have established legal protections for a free press (Potter, 2006, p. 2).

Click here to check the ranking of your country in the World Press Freedom Index.

Journalists in a free society also have this common responsibility: To keep citizens informed. While doing this, journalists must provide accurate information, report that information fairly, completely, independently from outside influences and be totally unbiased in gathering information and presenting the news (Potter, 2006, p. 2; Quandt & Singer, 2009, p. 140).

“Journalists are not mere transmission belts for their own viewpoints or for information provided by others. They do original reporting, they do not confuse fact with opinion or rumour, and they make sound editorial decisions. A principal responsibility of journalism ... is ‘applying judgement to information’.”(Potter, 2006, p. 9)

Today, anyone with a device connected to the Internet is able to disseminate any information with a blog, web site or social media and can reach as wide an audience as the largest news centres. But these sources of news are not necessarily reliable. Huge amount of information makes the “truth” fuzzy for most people. Therefore, the role of the journalists has become more important than ever for a democratic society. The nature of the profession forces the journalist to;

  • Select the reliable source and information
  • Rely on first-hand observation whenever possible
  • Consult multiple sources and verify the information
  • Determine its value before passing it on to public
  • Report accurately, objectively and fairly
  • Identify and present the sources (except for some rare occasions) of the information they obtained, so the audience can evaluate its credibility (Potter, 2006, p. 8-9).

As being an information-dependent profession, journalists owe their primary allegiance to the public (Potter, 2006, p. 2). Public enlightenment is the journalist’s duty and this is extremely important for justice and the foundation of democracy (Society of Professional Journalists, 2014). Journalism ethics aims to determine how existing norms apply to the main ethical issues of the day (Ward, 2009, p. 296).

Some ethical codes for journalism have been exhibited via various sources to ensure the free exchange of information that is accurate, fair and thorough. According to the Society of Professional Journalists these can be compiled in four basic titles (Society of Professional Journalists, 2014):

  • Seek truth and report it: Ethical journalism should be accurate and fair. Journalists should be honest and courageous in gathering, reporting and interpreting information.
  • Minimise harm: Ethical journalism treats sources, subjects, colleagues and members of the public as human beings deserving of respect.
  • Act independently: The highest and primary obligation of ethical journalism is to serve the public.
  • Be accountable and transparent: Ethical journalism means taking responsibility for one’s work and explaining one’s decisions to the public.


“In recent years, we have seen a collapse of the notion that politically relevant facts can be discerned by news professionals, leaving voters uncertain about whether the messages communicated by those professionals can be trusted. ... Social media has allowed individuals and small organisations to disseminate messages (perhaps accurate, perhaps false) directly to voters, unmediated by major news organisations. ...All this means is that voters are forced to identify news sources they trust. And because different news sources are disseminating different messages about the same matters, voters will now end up with more disparate views of reality than was the case decades ago.” Jon Krosnick(Source: Feder, 2020)

The “truth” is one of the main issues in journalism. But, especially in the last decade, the discussions on the concept of “truth” have disturbingly increased. In fact, it is seen that even the citizens of civilised societies cannot agree on even some basic facts. At this point, it is better to understand the definition of “journalistic” truth. Like scientists, journalists seek the truth that explains the world and helps people to function in life. The goal of a journalist is to find the best obtainable version of the truth on a given day. In order to do that, journalists have to collect as much evidence as possible. Here, the “possible” is a big qualifier since the journalists work with strict deadlines. They have to gather the evidence for the truth within a short time limit. Therefore, journalists and news consumers should always be asking this question: “Is there more relevant evidence that can be practically collected?” (Hornik, Anzalone & Spikes, 2018, p. 32-33)

It should be considered by the news consumers that the story could change in time. In such cases like natural disasters, the story must be followed in order to grasp the latest information such as the death toll or effectiveness of the policy response. These details will probably be revised in time not because a reporter got the facts wrong, but rather because the story develops over time and new facts emerge. As a news consumer, if a person wants to know the truth, s/he should be an active member of the news audience by vigorously following the issues and topics over time and should demand further investigation of the stories from the news media (Hornik, Anzalone & Spikes, 2018, p. 35)

News and News Values

Can news be defined as “a piece of information that you didn’t know about before”? Does it make it “newsworthy”, just because you didn’t know something before, or just because something is new? While thinking about the definition of news, you may find yourself asking such questions about making that piece of information interesting or newsworthy: Is this information about someone you know or about your neighbourhood? Does it impact your life directly? Does it change anything (for example your opinions or decisions)? Does it have any sort of conflicts? Do you consider it weird or bizarre? As a person who consumes news you may ask several questions if you have to tag a piece of information as news. Just like you, journalists ask similar questions in order to decide what is newsworthy, which are called “news values” (Gillman, 2015, p. 280).

"News" by popcornartsgfx is licensed under CC BY 4.0

News values are not only used to make decisions about the inclusion and exclusion of a piece of information or a material but also how it will be covered, who draws up the news story, and how it will appear in a news platform (such as in a newspaper or on a web page). Moreover, the basic criteria which include who, what, where, when, why and how are taken into account by journalists and other media specialists while assessing news values.

Although the news values sometimes can be labelled as a “slippery concept”, this has not prevented journalists from following them or researchers from attempting to create several taxonomies to clarify the concept (O’Neill & Harcup, 2009, p. 162-163; Gillman, 2015, p. 286). These values can be listed differently in several sources but the essence is as below (Potter, 2006, p. 5; Gillman, 2015, p. 282-283):

  • Timeliness / Currency: If something happened recently, this can make it newsworthy. Timeliness depends on the medium (e.g. “recently” can mean different for a weekly magazine or a news channel).
  • Impact: If a strong emotional response from the audience is involved after an event (such as murder of a woman by his ex-partner) or many people are affected from an incident (such as a flood in a town or COVID-19 pandemics), it can be considered as news.
  • Human interest: Journalists consider whether the information is socially interesting or important. An incident at a volleyball match may be in the news for several days because it’s the main topic of conversation in a society.
  • Novelty: Information that reveals something that is rare, unusual or even bizarre is potentially newsworthy, because the extraordinary happenings appeal to the human curiosity. As in the famous saying, “If a dog bites a man, that is not news. But if a man bites a dog, it’s news!”.
  • Controversy / Conflict: Human nature has an interest in stories that have conflict, tension, or public debate in it. Conflict is not only the argument of controversial opinions but also stories about a doctor battling a disease or citizens who stand against injustice also represent conflict.
  • Prominence: If a famous person is involved in an event, even if it is an ordinary thing, this can become news. A local car accident could make headlines around the world for several days if the driver was a famous musician.

News values can be thought of as a framework for analysing obtained information, in order to decide its newsworthiness. Especially when considering the age we are living in, where we are bombarded with information, news consumers should adopt these criteria to analyse, understand and decide on the type of information and its trustworthiness, rather than making decisions or understanding the world based on personal experiences. One should bear in mind that, “news” is a product of a series of rational judgements made by journalists or other media experts and people should consume this type of information making similar judgements, especially in this post-truth era (Gillman, 2015, p. 286).

Changing Characteristics of News

News can be originated from several places but journalists generally find news in one of the following environments (Potter, 2006, p. 7):

  • Events happened naturally, such as accidents, disasters, etc.
  • Programmed occasions, such as meetings, conferences, etc.
  • Reporters’ effort.

Today, news is a part of a networked public sphere, in other words, an ecosystem of interconnected platforms that expand the range of participatory discourse. Journalistic outputs that were once exclusive, such as news, opinions, data, information, headlines, updates and conversation are now everywhere in today's communication ecosystem (Perloff, 2020, p. 25-26). As a result of digitalisation;

  • News content can be distributed across multiple delivery platforms in a much faster way
  • News content can be made interactive
  • News content from different platforms can be included in a single news report
  • News consumers can be provided with the tools of media production, blurring the lines between media production and consumption (Bainbridge, Beasley & Tynan, 2015, p. 67-69).

"who-will-use-your-iphone-or-ipad-app" by Ramotionblog is licensed under CC BY-ND 2.0

The invention of the telegraph almost 150 years ago, has changed the transmission of information. The technology brings the “inverted pyramid” writing/reporting technique

where the most important information at the beginning of the story, followed by less important information, and so on to the end, which enables the story to be cut from the bottom in order to fit the space available. This is formulated with “who, what, where, when, why and how” format especially in printed news (usually “what” and “who” take precedence) which helps placing information in a hierarchy and fit the content within the boundaries of a limited page layout. Although some sources have claimed that this writing style has petered out with the emergence of the “soft news” disseminated via the internet based new media, it seems that it will continue to be used as it allows to convey information in a compact way (Tynan, 2015, p. 337; Goc, 2015a, p. 33; Scanlan, 2003).

“The seriousness of (the Covid-19 pandemic) crisis has reinforced the need for reliable, accurate journalism that can inform and educate populations, but it has also reminded us how open we have become to conspiracies and misinformation. Journalists no longer control access to information, while greater reliance on social media and other platforms give people access to a wider range of sources and ‘alternative facts’, some of which are at odds with official advice, misleading, or simply false” (Newman, 2020, p. 10)

The term digital media or new media is used to define mobile technologies (such as mobile phones) and internet based media (such as social networking sites, online gaming platforms, online broadcasting and news platforms and applications etc.). These platforms usually encourage its users to be socially engaged, establishing some sort of audience networks. These audience networks profoundly challenge the old broadcasting models and the way that we communicate (for example Facebook had almost 1.9 billion daily active users during the second quarter of 2021 (Statista Research Department, 2021). Moreover, digital media pushes people to consume all types of content extremely fast. Since these platforms are promoting a culture, based upon interactivity and virtuality it can be said that they also have an effect as altering societies (Bainbridge, Beasley & Tynan, 2015, p. 67-69).

News consuming habits of the world have been changing drastically since the mass-usage of the Internet. Conventional news media, such as printed newspapers, TV broadcasting, have begun to leave their place to social media and other online platforms, especially when compared to last decade (Newman, 2021, p. 10). This means, waiting for news to appear in a newspaper in the morning or to air in a regular news bulletin of a TV channel is no longer acceptable to most people (Bainbridge, Beasley & Tynan, 2015, p. 67-69).

This digital environment has transformed the characteristics of news as follows (Perloff, 2020, p. 22; Bainbridge, Beasley & Tynan, 2015, p. 68-69):

  • The architecture of news is multifaceted. It can be changed from highly in-depth in terms of contained information to including falsehoods.
  • The news-writing styles have begun to change.
    • Creating a sense of currency became more important as the news started to spread around digital and social media. Journalists tend to give less importance to the “when” of a story. This information tends to be in the later paragraphs of the news, instead of its introduction or headline. This sense of currency means the news story can be updated over a period of time.
    • More specifically, “who”, “what” and “where” attributes of a story (such as people’s names, places) became more prominent, which used to be in the later paragraphs of a news content instead of its introduction or headline. By this way it is generally aimed that the news content is noticed by the search engines.
    • Journalists do not have to wait for an official newsroom to approve and broadcast the story, since they usually have their own social media accounts. But one can bear in mind that, when journalists tweet especially during a crisis, their way of writing could be more subjective and their opinions could dominate the given context instead of facts.
  • Traditional news is still important but is no longer the leading gatekeeper. It is surrounded (sometimes overwhelmed) by different social media platforms that are changing the way news is obtained and consumed. For a journalist, following a range of local alerts can lead to exposing a new story. But, by using a smartphone, anyone could follow that sort of breaking news since most of the content can be customised according to location and could be obtained effortlessly by turning on the notifications of a phone application. This also has implications for who produces the news, as the citizen journalist has as much chance of capturing the story as a traditional newsroom.
  • Producing and delivering news is no longer the monopoly of media professionals. People can be a part of this process easily just by using their phones, which brings new voices to this practice (See: “New Forms of Journalism”).
  • News that was once easy to categorise has become more complex as journalism categories change (See: “New Forms of Journalism”).

New Forms of Journalism

In today’s digital world, journalists still need to collect information and create news stories which have to be factual, accurate, informative, fair and engaging. Thanks to the internet, new opportunities to report, interpret, share and update the news are available for the journalists. Thus, journalism has become a 24/7 global activity where there is no need to be restricted by the boundaries of a physical office or a newsroom. Moreover, in today’s digital habitat, news consumers are demanding to get news from various platforms such as Fabeook or Twitter. These new types of communities (referred to as “virtual crowd”) demand interactivity (they want to be engaged with the news from its production to transmission), need information in real time without any geographical limitations and mostly in visual or audio-visual forms (Bainbridge, Beasley & Tynan, 2015, p. 91; Goc & Tynan, 2015, p. 392; Kochler, 2017, p. 11). Journalists are not only expected to create accurate news content in shorter time frames than in the past but also they need to stay actively engaged with the audience from various platforms. This has resulted in the following concepts;

  • multidimensional / multimedia journalism, where journalists use digital platforms (such as blogs, social networks, websites, mobile apps) both to obtain information in order to produce the news and disseminate it to public (Bainbridge, Beasley & Tynan, 2015, p. 91; Goc & Tynan, 2015, p. 392),
  • public journalism / civic journalism / citizen journalism / participatory journalism / engaged journalism / community-centred journalism / networked journalism, which demonstrates a new form of journalism that focuses on the needs of the community it serves by also allowing them actively set the agenda and be a part of the newsmaking process (Coddington & Lewis, 2021; Philips, 2015, p. 90-91).

"Chuck on the scene - Citizen journalism" by Tony Webster is licensed under CC BY 2.0

The new power of the news consumer which makes them citizen journalists brings various opportunities and advantages to the public. For example, in a war zone these volunteer masses of people can inform the world right in the center of the bombs in real-time. These citizen journalists work generally with no wages and voluntarily, and can produce news content mostly online in various forms from well-produced podcasts or YouTube channels to editorial comments on blogs or Twitter on newsworthy topics. But new technologies always escalate the conflict between speed and accuracy which are the core of traditional journalism practices. The power of information can cause great harm to people and societies if misused. Therefore news consumers need to approach these new types of journalism activities by thinking more critically and have to think twice before spreading information to others (Goc, 2015b, p. 489; Hornik, Anzalone & Spikes, 2018, p. 160-161). On the other hand, for example citizen journalists can also help news media to correct their errors by contributing news coverage. For example in Egypt, the rapid spread of unverified information on the internet made citizen reporters a sort of inspection mechanism who could identify inaccuracies or bias in the news content (Chan, 2014, p. 116). In that sense, if citizen journalists can interiorise and adopt the basic values of journalism, biassed news can be prevented to some extent and this effort of spreading factual information can also be an important contribution to democracy.

By the proliferation of digitalisation, larger amounts of information more than ever before have become produced, stored and accessed, which formed what is called the “big data”. This brings new analysis opportunities for a lot of professions including journalists, to make solid decisions, to build rational policies and so on. Today, journalists are able to find evidence and to present unseen facts or insights about a topic by working with enormous volumes of data in order to understand how the results may affect the public (e.g. Wikileaks). By this way, they investigate stories that are buried in the internet that might not otherwise have been revealed. This of course requires new journalistic skills and specialisation. These professionals are generally called “data journalists” (a.k.a. computer-assisted reporting) (Bainbridge, Beasley & Tynan, 2015, p. 69, 91).

Effects of Media on People

The latest information revolution has transformed the world, by making it possible to publish any information with a computer or smartphone. People are bombarded with huge amounts of information. These could not only be about advances in health, education or social engagement, which mostly make the world a better place, but also much of that information can be misleading (such as anti-vaccination movements) which can cause massive harm to the public. Thus, the “information age” confronts us with the following significant challenges that force us to reconsider the ways we consume and share information (Hornik, Anzalone & Spikes, 2018, p. 11-12):

  • Information overload: The amount of information made it harder than ever to distinguish reliable information from fabricated ones.
  • Crisis of authenticity: It is possible and easier to create and spread misinformation that looks authentic with new technologies.
  • Speed versus accuracy: People want to obtain information as quickly as possible which has increased the chances that the information will not be accurate.
  • Audience bias: People tend to consume and believe the information that supports their already existing ideas (See Module 3 for more details).

“People are more willing to share an article than read it... This is typical of modern information consumption. People form an opinion based on a summary, or a summary of summaries, without making the effort to go deeper.” (Dewey, 2016)

Because any kind of information including news is no longer the monopoly of any profession, people found themselves alone with the information flood and some natural cognitive biases became a part of the daily information consumption routines (See Module 3 for more details). Social media has taken the lead as a news source and the news has also been parsed in social media. This means, people do not come across one story from a specific news source but rather mixed in with content from many other sources. This is quite different from watching a newscast or reading a newspaper, where all the content comes from the same source (American Press Institute, 2016, p. 20). The evolution of the news consumer to news producer has increased the spread of misinformation (Hornik, Anzalone & Spikes, 2018, p. 155). Especially during a crisis, mostly out of a natural survival instinct, people tend to spread any kind of information very quickly in order to protect themselves and their loved ones. According to a study, 59 percent of links are shared without reading on social media. It also revealed that this “share even without clicking it” sort of action is genuinely important in determining what news gets circulated and what just fades off the public radar. This means, this sharing habit is actually sculpting communities with shared political and cultural agendas, without a solid background (Dewey, 2016). In a related research, the motivations of people for sharing information were investigated and the following motives were revealed (Stearns, 2016):

  • People want to help: So much breaking news is dominating people's lives as never before because of social media feeds. This content could be anything from written information to videos, mostly unfiltered and raw. The result can be a “burgeoning sense of helplessness”. When they are faced with a tragedy most people want to help others by spreading the information as quickly as possible and warn their followers, which mostly helps add context to the chaos. A rush to share without verifying any information can hurt others more than it can help.
  • People want to make sense of the world: When there is breaking news, there is more unknown than known. People tend to discuss with other people to understand what is happening, to confirm a story in their minds or echoe their view of the world, which generally ends up disseminating rumours as if they were facts. In such times, rumours are sort of a coping mechanism to fill in gaps of the current knowledge or obtained information especially in situations of danger and uncertainty.
  • People want to feel part of the shared experience: Especially, when people are challenged with ambiguity, hopelessness or anxiety they generally gather in digital crowds around online live streams or hashtags. During these times, sharing often feels like empathy. In such cases, to be in a hurry to share the feelings mostly ends up sharing manipulated images and misinformation about the incident. Because for the person sharing, it doesn’t need to be true, it just needs to feel true.
  • Emotional networks instead of information networks: Although it is easy to judge people spreading misinformation during a crisis, in reality the instinct to share is driven by a complex network of motivations and emotions. Emotions drive sharing in ways that complicate the search for truth in the moment of crisis. The reason for most people who spread misinformation by sharing it, is generally they are more interested in the emotion that information evokes. In the past, if an institution had done this, it would have been “bad journalism”. When social media is operating as both emotional and information networks this becomes a problem. Because, what people share (emotion) and what people want to find (facts) are often in a conflict.

News can also be overwhelming since the bad news dissemination can generally be faster than the good ones (Bushman, Williams & Wittenberg-Moerman, 2013, p. 29). In such an era where people are confronted with bad news a lot, some psychological impacts are inevitable such as a burgeoning sense of helplessness, seeing the world a darker place, being more pessimistic about possibilities etc. In such a psychology, people’s decision-making process can be affected (Singal, 2014) and this could impact various sizes of milestones in life including a result of an election to be a part of an anti-vaccination movement. A growing number of people are stating that they avoid the news to overcome this (Dahl & Riesman, 2014). One of the studies revealed that almost one third (32%) of people from all over the world, deliberately avoid the news (Newman, 2019, p. 26). According to some reports, they avoid news because they find it too sad or stressful, and because they don’t trust it (Coddington & Lewis, 2020).

To overcome these challenges, people must approach information more analytically with the following principles which should be applied to all sorts of news media platforms in everyday life (Hornik, Anzalone & Spikes, 2018, p. 11, 161; Singal, 2014):

  • Question the obtained information instead of simply consuming it.
  • Be patient and follow the story as the facts appear and truth begins to turn up.
  • Verify the information before sharing it on any platform or with anybody.
  • Do not consider the rank and popularity as a proxy for reliability of an information.
  • Be aware of the fact that the sender of information is often not its source.
  • Be aware of the implicit prejudices of human cognition which we all carry.
  • Be aware that the reason for facing a lot of bad news is not necessarily because the world is an inherently evil place, but because both news outlets and consumers may have incentives to broadcast explosively negative news stories.

These highlights will not only help journalists to be accountable to the public which they serve and inform (Hornik, Anzalone & Spikes, 2018, p. 11) but also help the public to raise awareness about the news environment and to gain new skills in order to survive in this post-truth era.


  1. Click here to check the ranking of your country in the World Press Freedom Index. Discuss the criteria and indicators of the index. What do you think about the advantages or disadvantages to be at the top or at the bottom of this list?
  2. Identify news stories from different platforms such as local and national newspaper websites and other types of online news platforms (news outlets). Try to make a judgement about the news values of each story. For example, did you detect a story that was published because of its proximity to the target followers/readers of the news platform or newspaper? Or did you see any stories that were published because of the prominence of one or more people featured in the story?



American Press Institute, (2016). A New Understanding: What Makes People Trust and Rely on News. Retrieved from:

Bainbridge, J., Beasley, C. & Tynan, L. (2015). The Digital and Social Media Environment. In Bainbridge, J., Goc, N I., & Tynan, L. (Eds.). Media and Journalism: New Approaches to Theory and Practice (pp. 65-92). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

Bushman, R.M. Williams, C.D. & Wittenberg-Moerman, R. (2013). The Informational Role of the Media in Private Lending. Retrieved from:

Chan, Y.Y. (2014). Journalism and Digital Times: Between Wider Reach and Sloppy Reporting. Retrieved from:

Coddington, M & Lewis, S. (2021, May 11). Why do people avoid news? It’s not just because it makes them feel bad. NiemanLab. Retrieved from:

Coddington, M. & Lewis, S. (2020, March 6). Why avoiding the news is a social habit. RQ1. Retrieved from:

Dahl, M. & Riesman, A. (2014, August 8). What news story are you most freaked out about? The Cut.

Dewey, C. (2016, June 16). 6 in 10 of you will share this link without reading it, a new, depressing study says. Washington Post. Retrieved from:

Feder, S. (2020, February 27). Stanford researchers discuss journalism and democracy in lead up to Super Tuesday. Stanford News. Retrieved from:

Gillman, S. (2015). News Values and News Culture in a Changing World. In Bainbridge, J., Goc, N I., & Tynan, L. (Eds.). Media and Journalism: New Approaches to Theory and Practice (pp. 280-293). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

Goc, N. (2015a). The First Mass Medium. In Bainbridge, J., Goc, N I., & Tynan, L. (Eds.). Media and Journalism: New Approaches to Theory and Practice (pp. 24-44). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

Goc, N. (2015b). Case Study 5: Free Speech and Journalism in the 21st Century. In Bainbridge, J., Goc, N I., & Tynan, L. (Eds.). Media and Journalism: New Approaches to Theory and Practice (pp. 485-491). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

Goc, N. & Tynan, L. (2015). Ethics in Communication. In Bainbridge, J., Goc, N I., & Tynan, L. (Eds.). Media and Journalism: New Approaches to Theory and Practice (pp. 382-404). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

Hornik, R., Anzalone, J. & Spikes, M. (2018). GetNewsSmart: A Guide to Understanding the Key Concepts of News Literacy. New York: The Center for News Literacy.

Kochler, H. (2017). Idea and politics of communication in the global age. In M. Friedrichsen & Y. Kamalipour (Eds.). Digital Transformation in Journalism and News Media, Media Business and Innovation (pp. 7-16). Cham: Springer.

Newman, N. (2019). Section 1: Executive summary and key findings. In N. Newman, R. Fletcher, A. Kalogeropoulos ve R. K. Nielsen (Eds.), Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2019 (pp.8-31). Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Retrieved from:

Newman, N. (2020). Section 3: Country and market data: Europe. In N. Newman, R. Fletcher, A. Schulz, S. Andı & R. K. Nielsen (Eds.), Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020 (pp.9-31). Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Retrieved from:

Newman, N. (2021). Executive summary and key findings. In N. Newman, R. Fletcher, A. Schulz, S. Andı, C.T. Robertson & R.K. Nielsen (Eds.), Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2021 (pp.9-30). Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Retrieved from:

O’Neill, D. & Harcup, T. (2009). News values and selectivity. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen, & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.). The Handbook of Journalism Studies (pp. 161-174). New York: Routledge.

Perloff, R.M. (2020). The Dynamics of News: Journalism in the 21st-Century Media Milieu. New York: Taylor & Francis.

Philips, A. (2015). Journalism in Context: Practice and Theory for the Digital Age. London: Routledge.

Potter, D. (2006). Handbook of Independent Journalism. Washington, DC: Bureau of International Information Programs, U.S. Department of State.

Purdue University. (n.d.). Journalism and Journalistic Writing: Introduction. Retrieved from:

Quandt, T. & Singer, J.B. (2009). Convergence and cross-platform content production. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen, & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.). The Handbook of Journalism Studies (pp. 130-144). New York: Routledge.

Scanlan, C. (2003). Birth of the Inverted Pyramid: A Child of Technology, Commerce and History. Retrieved from:

Singal, J. (2014, August 8). What all this bad news is doing to us. The Cut. Retrieved from:

Society of Professional Journalists (2014). SPJ Code of Ethics. Retrieved from:

Statista Research Department. (2021). Facebook: Number of Daily Active Users Worldwide 2011-2021. Retrieved from:

Stearns, J. (2016). Why do People Share Rumours and Misinformation in Breaking News? Retrieved from:

Tynan, L. (2015). Subediting, News Language and Convention. In Bainbridge, J., Goc, N I., & Tynan, L. (Eds.). Media and Journalism: New Approaches to Theory and Practice (pp. 330-350). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

Ward, S.J.A. (2009). Journalism ethics. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen, & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.). The Handbook of Journalism Studies (pp. 295-309). New York: Routledge.

WikiLeaks. (2021, September 13). In Wikipedia. Retrieved from:

Recommended Sources

Potter, D. (2006). Handbook of Independent Journalism. Washington, DC: Bureau of International Information Programs, U.S. Department of State. (Chpt.1: “What is news?” pp. 4-11; Chpt. 7: “Ethics and law” pp. 54-60).

Hornik, R., Anzalone, J. and Spikes, M. (2018). GetNewsSmart: A Guide to Understanding the Key Concepts of News Literacy. New York: The Center for News Literacy. (Chpt. 5: “Is It Journalism? How to Navigate the Information Neighborhoods?” pp. 60-70).

IFJ. (n.d.). Global Charter of Ethics for Journalists. Retrieved from

Recommended Video

Stony Brook Center for News Literacy (2021). Stony Brook University Journalism Professor Steven Reiner applies VIA to the NEWS information neighborhood.